TitleTwo for the seesaw: requester and requested
Journal titlePolish Psychological Bulletin
Divisions of PASNauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne
PublisherCommittee for Psychological Science PAS
SourcePolish Psychological Bulletin; 2011; No 3
ReferencesBargh J. (1997), Advances in social cognition, 10, 1. ; Bargh J. (1999), The unbearable automaticity of being, American Psychologist, 54, 462, doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462 ; Birnbaumer N. (1999), Biologische Psychologie. ; Black I. (1991), Information in the brain. ; Brehm J. (1966), A theory of psychological reactance. ; Burger J. (1986), Increasing compliance by improving the deal: that's not all technique, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 277, doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.117 ; Cialdini R. (2001), Influence. Science and practice. ; Cialdini R. (1978), Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: Commitment then cost, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 463, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1683 ; Cialdini R. (1975), Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 206, doi.org/10.1037/h0076284 ; Davis B. (1999), A disrupt-then-reframe technique of social influence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 192, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124 ; (1991), Fear, avoidance, and phobias. A fundamental analysis. ; Dolinski D. (2002), Fear-then-relief, mindlessness, and cognitive deficits, European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 435, doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.100 ; Dolinski D. (2001), Dialogue involvement as a social influence technique, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1395, doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711001 ; Dolinski D. (1998), ‘Fear-then-relief’ procedure for inducing compliance. Beware when the danger is over, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 27, doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1341 ; Dolinski, D. & Szczucka, K. (2011). <i>Emotional disrupt-then-reframe.</i> Manuscript submitted for publication. ; Epstein S. (1965), Stepness of approach and avoidance gradients in humans as a function of experience: Theory and experiment, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1, doi.org/10.1037/h0021990 ; Erickson M. (1964), The confusion technique in hypnosis, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 6, 183, doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1964.10402343 ; Freedman J. (1966), Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195, doi.org/10.1037/h0023552 ; Frijda N. (1986), The Emotions. Studies in emotion and social interaction. ; Gromski W. (1984), Some determinants of perceived responsibility and guilt in a compliance situation, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 15, 235. ; Herling-Grudzinski G. (1965), Inny swiat. ; Langer E. (1989), Mindfulness. ; Langer E. (1978), The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of ‘placebic’ information in interpersonal interaction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635, doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1995 ; Meeus W. (1995), Obedience in modern society: The Utrecht studies, Journal of Social Issues, 51, 155, doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01339.x ; Milgram S. (1974), Obedience to authority: An experimental view. ; Navon D. (1984), Resources - a theoretical soup stone?, Psychological Review, 91, 216, doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.216 ; Neisser U. (1976), Cognition and reality. ; Oatley K. (1996), Understanding emotions. ; Posner M. (1975), Information processing and cognition. The Loyola symposium, 55. ; Shontz F. (1975), The psychological aspects of physical illness and disability. ; Spielberger C. (1970), Stait-trait anxiety inventory test manual for form X. ; Taylor S. (1981), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment, 189. ; Tuma A. (1985), Anxiety and the anxiety disorder. ; Vallacher R. (1987), What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior, Psychological Review, 94, 3, doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3 ; Vallacher R. (1989), Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660, doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.520 ; Wegner D. (1984), The emergence of action, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 269, doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2069
Aims and scopePolish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.
Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.
For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.
Abstracting & Indexing
Abstracting and Indexing Information
• DESY Publication Database
• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences
• ERIH Plus
• Google Scholar
• Index Copernicus
• Science Open
• SCOPUS (Elsevier)